Type: New Feature
Fix Version/s: None
Yes, Windows Server 2003 SP2 on FAT32.
It would certainly be interesting to know where the difference comes from, but I wouldn't consider it a priority. Working correctly on NTFS is desirable but optional - ROS can't be installed on NTFS, so testing on NTFS isn't useful yet.
It would be interesting to have both a Test WHS_FAT32 and a Test WHS_NTFS.
*FAT(32) is the only FS really supported by ReactOS yet.
*NTFS is not a priority until ROS has write support (which is WIP), but already nice to have.
\ Yet, testers(++) can have WXP/WS2003 on NTFS.
This issue is to:
1) Explicit (and possibly rename) what the existing VM has.
2) Ask for a VM with the other FS. (Major if missing FAT32, Minor if missing NTFS.)
WS2003, it looks like this is NTFS (= keep/rename it) and we are missing FAT32.